The dream-reports in Bräker’s diaries reflect the changes in his intellectual biography: starting as pietistic soul-searchings, they soon become finger-exercises in the self-training of an aspiring author. The essay analyses factual dream-representations in the diaries of three authors: Ulrich Bräker, Gottfried Keller and Arthur Schnitzler. To get closer to the ›negative capability‹ of the original dream-experience, mimetic devices can therefore also be supplemented (or substituted) by alternative (nonmimetic) modes of oneiricity, such as secondary oneiricity (borrowing motifs from the fantastic, the fairy-tale, myth, etc., illustrated by literary dreams by Jean Paul and Heine), and the poetic simulation of a dream space by the use of suitable current literary devices – like Trakl’s use of Expressionist poetics in his prose poem 'Traum und Umnachtung' (Dream and Derangement).

Texts written like that will, however, only mimic the dream as we remember it when awake – as a sequence of deviations from our waking world. the notation rules of empirical psychology for factual dream-reports). Section 5 will formulate some hypotheses for a more complex view of a poetics of oneiric defamiliarization: This can, of course, be based on attempts to imitate dreams and related writing techniques (e.g. Section 4 will discuss some historical examples of dreams which are clearly shaped by (familiarizing) cultural and textual patterns (a message-dream and a symbolic dream by Homer an incubation-dream by Aelius Aristides a dream-vision by Jean Paul) and try to scale their oneiricity. Starting with an attempt to outline characteristics of the dream-world (section 1), the essay sketches a tentative systematic poetics of dream narration, which is based on a dialectical interplay between devices of familiarization and defamilarization (2 3).

Download dream bible